Comparison
SprintFlint vs Asana Sprints, not just task lists
Asana is a powerful task tracker, but agile teams need sprints, velocity, and retros, not endless lists. SprintFlint is built for the sprint cycle from day one.
At a glance
| Factor | SprintFlint | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Engineering sprint cycles | General task & project tracking |
| Sprint Cadence | First-class: sprints, planning, review | Sections / lists; no native sprint cycle |
| Retrospectives | Built-in, AI-summarised | None; teams use external tools |
| Velocity & Burndown | Automatic from ticket movement | Not available; workarounds via dashboards |
| Story Points | Native field on every ticket | Custom field setup required |
| AI Features | Sprint planning, ticket import, autoplay | Asana Intelligence (paid add-on) |
| Pricing | £5/user/month, unlimited issues | $10.99-$24.99/user/month for sprint-friendly tiers |
Feature-by-feature comparison
Philosophy: Sprint Cycles vs Endless Lists
SprintFlint
- Every ticket lives in a sprint with a start, end, goal, and review
- Velocity, burndown, and capacity update automatically
- Retrospectives close every sprint; no separate tool
- Designed for engineering teams who ship in two-week cadences
Asana
- Tasks live in sections, lists, boards, and timelines
- "Sprints" are usually faked with section names like "Sprint 12"
- No built-in cadence; when does a sprint end? You decide manually.
- Great for marketing ops, content calendars, and cross-functional projects; not engineering sprints
Sprint Metrics: Built-in vs Bring Your Own
SprintFlint
- Velocity: Calculated from completed story points per sprint
- Burndown: Live during the sprint, no setup
- Capacity planning: Based on rolling-average velocity
- Sprint health: Flags blockers and at-risk goals
Asana
- Reports: Generic project dashboards; not sprint-aware
- Burndown: Requires manual chart configuration or third-party
- Velocity: Spreadsheet exports + manual calculation
- Story points: Custom field, not aggregated by default
Retrospectives: Native vs Missing
SprintFlint
- One-click retro at the end of every sprint
- AI summarises blockers, achievements, and recurring themes
- Action items convert directly into next-sprint tickets
- Historic retros searchable across sprints
Asana
- No native retro feature
- Most teams run retros in Miro, Notion, Google Docs, or FunRetro
- Action items live in a different tool; easy to lose them
- Asana's project templates can be repurposed for retros, but they're just docs
When to choose each
For Agile Teams
Choose SprintFlint if:
- You run actual two-week (or weekly) sprints
- You estimate work in story points and want velocity tracking
- Retrospectives are part of your team's rhythm
- You want one tool that covers backlog, sprint, retro, and reports
- Your team is engineering-led, not cross-functional ops
Choose Asana if:
- Your team is primarily marketing, ops, content, or HR
- You don't need sprints, velocity, or burndown charts
- You need timeline views, workload management across many projects
- You're already deeply integrated with Asana's portfolio features
- You don't run retrospectives, or you have a separate tool for them
Run Real Sprints. Skip the Workarounds.
SprintFlint imports from Asana via CSV in minutes. Try sprint management built for engineering; free for the first 300 tickets.
Free 300 tickets • No credit card required • CSV import from Asana